Browsing Expert Curation...

Need help?
Systematic Name Gene Name Motif ID Expert Confidence Dubious? Notes
V YOL067C RTG1 1493 Low   1493 and 1494 are a toss-up and could represent different dimerization partners, conceivably. Similar to 1445 and 1446 above. Retain both but give low confidence.
V YOL067C RTG1 1494 Low   1493 and 1494 are a toss-up and could represent different dimerization partners, conceivably. Similar to 1445 and 1446 above. Retain both but give low confidence.
V YFL031W HAC1 94 Medium   1788 is the overall winner. But, literature motif 94 also scores well in ChIP-chip, despite being somewhat different. Possible difference in heterodimerazation partners, or proteolytic fragment? Retain both.
V YFL031W HAC1 1788 High   1788 is the overall winner. But, literature motif 94 also scores well in ChIP-chip, despite being somewhat different. Possible difference in heterodimerization partners, or proteolytic fragment? Retain both, score 94 as medium.
V YOL028C YAP7 1737 High   7-base bZIP core. Obtained in ChIP-chip studies and higher correspondence to stressed ChIP-chip data. Possible heterodimer? Little literature on this protein. 1737 chosen because it is largely symmetric and has highest score for both stressed and unstressed Harbison data, also, higher GO score
V YOL028C YAP7 1414 High   8-base bZIP core. Obtained by Mitomi, so this is a homodimer. Higher correspondence to unstressed ChIP-chip data. Little literature on this protein. 1414 chosen for higher ChIP-chip overall scores; plus, it is a palindrome as expected for a bZIP protein.
V YER169W RPH1 547 High   About half of the motifs look similar to each other, with GGGG core typical of many yeast C2H2 proteins. PBM motif 547 has meaningful scores on both ChIP-chip and mutant expression data. I'm somewhat concerned that motif 279 lacks two A residues captured by both PBM experiments.
V YPR065W ROX1 1396 High   About half the motifs have a typical ACAAT Sox core. MITOMI motif 1396 has highest correspondence to both ChIP-chip and deletion expression data.
V YCR040W MATALPHA1 1418 Low   According to PMID: 15118075, binds the "Q site" which has "consensus" ACAATGACAG. Seems all that is in common is the CAAT. I believe further study is required.
V YCR039C MATALPHA2 1364 High   According to PMID: 9858582, "A comparison of the 2 binding sites in both asg and hsg operators yields the same consensus sequence, 5'-CATGTA-3"; results in Figure 2 of the same paper support a consensus of CATGTAA. MITOMI yields ACATG, which is the reverse complement of most of the literature consensus. Motif 1364 has highest information content; use this.
V YBR083W TEC1 815 High   All motifs agree, and are significant by several criteria. PBM motif 815 has the second-highest scores overall, and it is non-circular for in vivo binding. Also has highest GO score.
V YOR380W RDR1 2158 High   All motifs are related except 1851. PBM motif 2158 is monomeric and has highest correspondence to ChIP-chip data. The literature motif 756 consists of two back-to-back and slightly overlapping versions of the monomeric PBM motif. There is no evidence for direct binding in this specific spacing and orientation; however, the results of mutations in reporters indicate that both copies are necessary for induction in the mutant. Retain both motifs.
V YOR380W RDR1 756 Medium   All motifs are related except 1851. PBM motif 2158 is monomeric and has highest correspondence to ChIP-chip data. The literature motif 756 consists of two back-to-back and slightly overlapping versions of the monomeric PBM motif. There is no evidence for direct binding in this specific spacing and orientation; however, the results of mutations in reporters indicate that both copies are necessary for induction in the mutant. Retain both motifs.
V YDR207C UME6 2239 High   All motifs are similar to each other. BEEML-PBM motif 2239 scores highest across the board.
V YBR049C REB1 907 High   All motifs are similar. ChIP-chip motif 907 has highest correspondence to both ChIP-chip and expression data, and strongly resembles MITOMI and PBM motifs.
V YHR084W STE12 400 High   All motifs but one resemble the canonical literature site. Motif 400 is derived from ChIP-chip data (on which it scores highest) but also scores highest on expression data.
V YPL133C RDS2 2226 Medium   All motifs contain CGG. PBM motif 2226 appears to be a monomeric version of literature motif 757. However, the paper that produced motif 757 did not demonstrate that this is an optimal binding site. Retain both motifs and give them a "medium" confidence.
V YPL133C RDS2 757 Medium   All motifs contain CGG. PBM motif 2226 appears to be a monomeric version of literature motif 757. However, the paper that produced motif 757 did not demonstrate that this is an optimal binding site. Retain both motifs and give them a "medium" confidence.
V YHR178W STB5 1405 High   All motifs have CGG core and most have CGGnG. Most ChIP-derived motifs have no relationship to expression data. Mitomi motif 1405 and PBM motif 514 score decently on both ChIP-chip and expression data, and seem to nail the GO category (oxidative stress response), and look like classic Gal4 halfmers. MITOMI motif scores slighly higher overall. This is presumably the monomeric motif
V YHR178W STB5 2068 Medium   All motifs have CGG core and most have CGGnG. Most ChIP-derived motifs have no relationship to expression data. Motif 2068 scores highest overall; looks a bit unusual for a Gal4 class motif but also does well on expression data. Retain as potential dimer motif, although it may also incorporate extrinsic information.
V YPL202C AFT2 389 High   All motifs look similar. ChIP-chip motif 389 scores high on ChIP-chip data and also best on expression data.
V YCR106W RDS1 506 High   All motifs look similar. PBM motif 506 has a higher score on ChIP-chip than any of the ChIP-chip derived motifs.
V YDR096W GIS1 562 High   All motifs similar; PBM motif 562 has highest correspondence to deletion expression data and overexpression data
V YPL128C TBF1 2178 High   All motifs, obtained by three different means, are all very similar, although there is no ChIP or expression support for any of them. Went with 2178, which is the BEEML output.
V YLR013W GAT3 2128 High   All PBM motifs look similar, also similar to a subset of other GATAs. 2128 scores quite highly on ChIP-chip (albeit with negative correlation!), and also higher on expression and OE data.
V YOR344C TYE7 397 High   All studies except one get canonical HLH motif. 795 (PBM) is nearly tied for best ChIP-chip score with the best ChIP-chip motif. Still, ChIP motif 397 scores higher, and looks identical, but with fewer flanking empty positions.
V YDL056W MBP1 2138 High   Almost all motifs look similar to literature binding site. PBM motif 2138 scores at the top on ChIP-chip and expression. And is non-circular.
V YFR034C PHO4 2222 High   Almost all motifs match classic HLH E-box. PBM motif 2222 has highest match to both ChIP-chip and expression data, without being circular.
V YDL170W UGA3 651 High   Appears to be a dimeric GAL4-class motif. Scores highest in ChIP-chip data, but is derived from the same data. GO seems to match known function!
V YDL170W UGA3 486 Medium   Appears to be a monomeric GAL4-class motif. Derived from PBM data, scores highly in ChIP-chip data, but not as high as the dimeric site derived from the ChIP-chip data.
V YHR056C RSC30 2164 Medium   Arbitrary choice - all PBM motifs look similar (and resemble motif from homolog Rsc3). I have downgraded this one from high to medium because the best scoring motif actually looks the least like the Rsc3 motif.
V YLR266C PDR8 244 Medium   Both motifs are equally credible but have very limited support. Literature motif is related to that of YRR1 literature motif. PBM motif, however, is a classic GAL4 monomer. This is the literature motif.
V YLR266C PDR8 528 Medium   Both motifs are equally credible but have very limited support. Literature motif is related to that of YRR1 literature motif. PBM motif, however, is a classic GAL4 monomer. This is the PBM motif.
V YML099C ARG81 1506 High   ChIP motif 1506 correlates well with ChIP and also with expression data. Resembles dimeric GAL4 class motif.
V YFL044C OTU1 1166 Low   ChIP-chip motif 1166 has a good relationship to ChIP-chip data, but it is unusual for C2H2 motifs to be A/T rich, and there is no other support for this motif, so it could be a cofactor, nucleosome-excluding, TATA element, etc. In addition, it only has a single C2H2 domain, and is known to function as a deubiquitylation enzyme. Low confidence.
V YPL248C GAL4 1510 High   ChIP-chip motif 1510 resembles literature motif, and PBM motif 875, but scores highly on ChIP and expression data, across the board. Note, however, that the high ChIP-chip scores stem from an experiment with high negative correlation. PBM motif 2206 appears to be a monomeric version, socres even higher on ChIP-chip and expression.
V YPL248C GAL4 2206 High   ChIP-chip motif 1510 resembles literature motif, and PBM motif 875, but scores highly on ChIP and expression data, across the board. Note, however, that the high ChIP-chip scores stem from an experiment with high negative correlation. PBM motif 2206 appears to be a monomeric version, socres even higher on ChIP-chip and expression.
V YLR014C PPR1 2064 Low   ChIP-chip motif 2064 almost matches the literature site, which has been confirmed by directed experimentation, and scores highest on most measures. But, give it low confidence - it is not at all clear that this is an optimal binding site, and none of the scores for any of the motifs are all that high.
V YMR016C SOK2 404 High   ChIP-chip motif 404 has highest correspondence to both ChIP-chip and expression data - and strongly resembles PBM motif
V YHL027W RIM101 600 High   ChIP-chip motif 600 is almost identical to PBM motif 513, but scores slightly higher on expression data. Three of six motifs are very similar.
V YFL021W GAT1 962 High   ChIP-chip motif 962 scores higher on both ChIP-chip and expression data
V YPR104C FHL1 2203 High   ChIP-chip motifs are all Rap1. PBMs identify a different motif which also corresponds to ChIP-chip data. Selected 2203 as it scores highest on ChIP-chip and expression data.
V YIR018W YAP5 777 High   ChIP-chip yields a classic 7-mer Yap motif that scores well on ChIP and significantly on expression.
V YHL009C YAP3 672 High   ChIP-chip yields a classic 7-mer Yap motif that scores well on ChIP and significantly on expression. Could be a heterodimer. Chose 672 over 1463 because it has a higher score on expression data, which is independent.
V YDR451C YHP1 716 High   ChIP-chip, EMSA, and one-hybrid all arrive at a classic homeodomain TAATTG motif. Microarray enrichment motif (716) scores higher on OE data from another study than ChIP motifs do, and does nearly as well on ChIP data.
V YJR060W CBF1 1346 High   Classic E-box. MITOMI motif 1346 nearly has highest correspondence to ChIP-chip data and is non-circular; no other supporting data
V YIL131C FKH1 2002 High   Classic Forkhead motif for most of them. 2002 strongly resembles PBM motif but scores higher on both ChIP (which is circular) and expression (which is not).
V YJL110C GZF3 2133 High   Classic GATA motif 2133 from PBM scores highest on ChIP-chip and expression data
V YOR162C YRR1 2245 High   Classic monomeric GAL4-class motif. PBM studies agree and score significantly on Harbison data. No other motifs have spacing/orientation except 11909958, but even the authors of this study note that "Only half a dyad seems to be conserved in this consensus sequence". 2245 scores highest in Harbison data.
V YDR423C CAD1 2098 High   Classic YAP motif in most cases. Include examples of both overlapping and adjacent monomeric sites - there are examples of both in PBM data and they both score highly on ChIP data. This one is adjacent.
V YDR423C CAD1 2073 High   Classic YAP motif in most cases. Include examples of both overlapping and adjacent monomeric sites - there are examples of both in PBM data and they both score highly on ChIP data. This one is overlapping.
V YLR176C RFX1 1478 Medium   Curious case - virtually all motifs are similar in appearance, with a common TGGCAAC core. They range from what appear to be monomers to full dimers, with multiple partial forms. However, none of them scores highly on both ChIP-chip and expression data. Select two representatives: one that scores well on ChIP-chip, and one that scores well on expression. This is the one that scores most highly on ChIP-chip. It is a dimer motif. Give medium confidence, since it has little relationship to expression data.
V YLR176C RFX1 496 Medium   Curious case - virtually all motifs are similar in appearance, with a common TGGCAAC core. They range from what appear to be monomers to full dimers, with multiple partial forms. However, none of them scores highly on both ChIP-chip and expression data. Select two representatives: one that scores well on ChIP-chip, and one that scores well on expression. This is the one that scores most highly on expression (close 2nd on deletion and 1st on overexpression). It is the only purely monomeric motif. Give medium confidence, since according to the literature this protein should bind as a dimer.
V YGL162W SUT1 673 Medium   Four motifs, all derived from ChIP-chip, contain CGG, but are unusual, with degeneracy and a core of CGGGG. Correlate somewhat with both OE and deletion data, however.
V YGL073W HSF1 1461 Medium   Four types of motifs contain TTC monomeric core and all score highly on both ChIP and expression. Appear to represent different monomeric/multimeric binding configurations. This is the dimeric head-to-tail site. From ChIP and prior.
V YGL073W HSF1 476 Medium   Four types of motifs contain TTC monomeric core and all score highly on both ChIP and expression. Appear to represent different monomeric/multimeric binding configurations. This is the monomeric site. From PBM.
V YGL073W HSF1 411 Medium   Four types of motifs contain TTC monomeric core and all score highly on both ChIP and expression. Appear to represent different monomeric/multimeric binding configurations. This is the spaced direct repeat dimeric site. From ChIP.
V YGL073W HSF1 615 Medium   Four types of motifs contain TTC monomeric core and all score highly on both ChIP and expression. Appear to represent different monomeric/multimeric binding configurations. This is the trimeric site. From ChIP.
V YPL075W GCR1 2071 High   Gcr2 is not a DNA-binding protein. SGD: "Gcr1p is a DNA-binding protein interacting with the consensus sequence CTTCC, whereas Gcr2p interacts with Gcr1p". But, ChIP-chip motif 606 is probably the best Gcr1 motif available (even though it came from Gcr2 ChIP).
V YKL043W PHD1 393 High   High-scoring motifs are all similar, with characteristic APSES GC core and palindromic. PBM motifs score highest on ChIP-seq data, while ChIP-chip motif 393 (which contains flanking G/C residues) scores highest on expression data. Retain both - possibly, the rest of the protein contributes to binding flanking residues. This is the ChIP motif that scores highest on expression data.
V YKL043W PHD1 2153 High   High-scoring motifs are all similar, with characteristic APSES GC core and palindromic. PBM motifs score highest on ChIP-seq data, while ChIP-chip motif 393 (which contains flanking G/C residues) scores highest on expression data. Retain both - possibly, the rest of the protein contributes to binding flanking residues. This is the higher-scoring PBM motif (2153).
V YLR131C ACE2 1332 High   Highest-scoring ChIP-chip motif is Rap1 site. MITOMI motif 1332 is next, and resembles the classic Swi5/Ace2 motif.
V YPR009W SUT2 2236 High   Highest-scoring motif (PBM) is a classical GAL4-type monomeric motif and is very significant in ChIP-chip
V YKR064W OAF3 0     I do not see how either of these motifs could possibly be a Gal4-class binding motif. And, there is no correspondence to any of the data, even the ChIP-chip data from which it is derived.
V YDL020C RPN4 1700 High   In vitro motifs do not contain the TTT sequence on the end. But they were derived from the DBD only. The rest of the protein may contribute to binding the TTT segment. Motif 1700 has the highest correspondence to ChIP-chip and expression and GO.
V YDR123C INO2 713 High   Ino2/4 binds as a heterodimer, so there should just be one motif for the two proteins. All motifs appear similar but none of them is derived from in vitro data. Nonetheless most motifs match a classic E-box with some preference for flanking bases. Motif 713 is derived from ChIP-chip; it is not the highest-scoring ChIP-chip motif but it is highest for OE and deletion expression.
V YOL108C INO4 713 High   Ino2/4 binds as a heterodimer, so there should just be one motif for the two proteins. All motifs appear similar but none of them is derived from in vitro data. Nonetheless most motifs match a classic E-box with some preference for flanking bases. Motif 713 is derived from ChIP-chip; it is not the highest-scoring ChIP-chip motif but it is highest for OE and deletion expression.
V YIR017C MET28 0     Like MET4, component of a complex. SGD: "Basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcriptional activator in the Cbf1p-Met4p-Met28p complex".."Both Met4p and Met28p bind to DNA only in the presence of Cbf1p, and the presence of Cbf1p and Met4p stimulates the binding of Met28p to DNA (1, 2).". ChIP-chip motif 703 (CTGTGG) is clearly the Met31/32 motif. The other ChIP-chip motif is essentially poly-A, and scores poorly. Hence, neither of these motifs represents the intrinsic sequence specificity of MET28. Need in vitro data for complexes.
V YDL106C PHO2 1680 Incorrect   Likely represents Abf1 binding site.
V YML099C ARG81 1507 Incorrect   Likely represents Mcm1 binding site.
V YKL185W ASH1 648 Incorrect   Likely represents Mcm1 binding site.
V YKL185W ASH1 932 Incorrect   Likely represents Mcm1 binding site.
V YOR372C NDD1 366 Incorrect   Likely represents Mcm1 binding site.
V YPL089C RLM1 1079 Incorrect   Likely represents Mcm1 binding site.
V YLR131C ACE2 918 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YLR098C CHA4 1607 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 1618 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 629 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 1196 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 1504 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 406 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YPR104C FHL1 893 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YGL013C PDR1 899 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YLR403W SFP1 1100 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YLR403W SFP1 357 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YLR403W SFP1 621 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YLR403W SFP1 1710 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YIR018W YAP5 896 Incorrect   Likely represents Rap1 binding site.
V YDL020C RPN4 1090 Incorrect   Likely represents Reb1 binding site.
V YMR053C STB2 710 Incorrect   Likely represents Reb1 binding site.
V YLR256W HAP1 2078 High   Literature binding site is direct CGG repeats with a 6bp spacer (PMID: 7958882). PBM motif 2078 gets this; it scores highest overall, including significant scores on both ChIP-chip and expression.
V YMR021C MAC1 1540 High   Literature motif 1540 most closely most closely corresponds to ChIP-chip data (albeit barely significant). Nothing else to gauge by, but no reason to doubt literature motif.
V YER045C ACA1 8 Medium   Literature motif 8 is supported by experimental investigation, and resembles a bZIP site, but has no other support; motif was not obtained objectively. Can bind as heterodimer. The highest-scoring motif (from ChIP, 1457) has low information content - I'm concerned it is learning other features of bound promoters.
V YCL058C FYV5 1417 Low   Literature motif is derived from a single promoter and while the protein seems to have some DNA-binding activity, perhaps in conjunction with other TFs, I find the evidence supporting this precise binding site incomplete, since it is derived from a single site. Hence, low confidence in the motif.
V YPR008W HAA1 1425 Medium   Literature motif is not completely determined, but scores highly on ChIP-chip data. Regardless, medium confidence.
V YGL254W FZF1 69 Low   Literature motif is the only one that appears credible. PBM motif I believe is a known artifact. Literature motif gets low confidence however as it is based on a single known binding sequence.
V YML065W ORC1 1549 High   Looks like ORC1 motif. Which is not really a TF, but it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YPL177C CUP9 2121 High   MITOMI and PBM motifs are similar. PBM motif 2121 has slightly lower correspondence to ChIP data, but more significant correspondence to expression data.
V YKR034W DAL80 1355 Medium   MITOMI motif 1355 has highest correspondence to ChIP-chip. But it's not striking..none of them are, despite the fact that this is a classic GATA site (GATAAG).
V YOL116W MSN1 1376 High   MITOMI motif 1376 has the highest correspondence to ChIP-chip. MITOMI motif 1378 is very close, however, and seems to be a circular permutation. Retain both motifs.

 Download displayed records: text csv html excel word Page: 1 of 4  Records: 354