Browse Motifs Help/About View Cart
Search for TF:
Selected Version: 1.02 - CHANGE

Browsing Expert Curation...

Need help?
Systematic Name Gene Name Motif ID Expert Confidence Dubious? Notes
V YKL032C IXR1 0   Dubious Binds cisplatin-modified DNA. HMG domains. ChIP-chip motifs not significant. Dubious and no credible motif.
V YLR223C IFH1 0   Dubious Cofactor of Fhl1p. No evidence for sequence-specific DNA-binding.
V YDR009W GAL3 0   Dubious Gal3 is not a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein
V YML051W GAL80 0   Dubious Gal80 is not a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein
V YNL199C GCR2 0   Dubious Gcr2 is not a DNA-binding protein. SGD: "Gcr1p is a DNA-binding protein interacting with the consensus sequence CTTCC, whereas Gcr2p interacts with Gcr1p". But, ChIP-chip motif 606 is probably the best Gcr1 motif available (even though it came from Gcr2 ChIP).
V YOR038C HIR2 0   Dubious Hir1,2,3 are a nucleosome assembly complex, not TFs
V YJR140C HIR3 0   Dubious Hir1,2,3 are a nucleosome assembly complex, not TFs
V YBL008W HIR1 0   Dubious Hir1,2,3 are a nucleosome assembly complex, not TFs
V YOR077W RTS2 0   Dubious Homolog of Kin17; not a typical C2H2 zinc finger. Believed to be "chromatin-associated proteins involved in UV response and DNA replication". No evidence for sequence-specific DNA-binding. Single ChIP-chip motif does not have strong correspondence to the data from which it is derived.
V YGR097W ASK10 0   Dubious I did not find any evidence that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YGR089W NNF2 0   Dubious I did not find any evidence that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YKR064W OAF3 0     I do not see how either of these motifs could possibly be a Gal4-class binding motif. And, there is no correspondence to any of the data, even the ChIP-chip data from which it is derived.
V YIL128W MET18 0   Dubious I found no evidence that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. ChIP-chip motif does not correlate with ChIP-chip data, or anything else.
V YGL197W MDS3 0   Dubious I found no evidence that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. ChIP-chip motif does not correlate with ChIP-chip data, or anything else.
V YJR094C IME1 0   Dubious Interacts with UME6. The only significant motif shares 5/6 bases with the UME6 motif core (GCCGCC)
V YOR229W WTM2 0   Dubious It is not clear that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein; it contains no DNA-binding domain and has no known in vitro sequence specificity. The motif comes only from ChIP-chip so scoring on ChIP-chip is circular.
V YIL119C RPI1 0   Dubious It is not clear that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein; it contains no DNA-binding domain and has no known in vitro sequence specificity. The motif comes only from ChIP-chip so scoring on ChIP-chip is circular.
V YKL072W STB6 0   Dubious It is not clear that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein; it contains no DNA-binding domain and has no known in vitro sequence specificity. The motif comes only from ChIP-chip so scoring on ChIP-chip is circular. The ChIP-chip motif looks a little like a Rap1 motif.
V YIR017C MET28 0     Like MET4, component of a complex. SGD: "Basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcriptional activator in the Cbf1p-Met4p-Met28p complex".."Both Met4p and Met28p bind to DNA only in the presence of Cbf1p, and the presence of Cbf1p and Met4p stimulates the binding of Met28p to DNA (1, 2).". ChIP-chip motif 703 (CTGTGG) is clearly the Met31/32 motif. The other ChIP-chip motif is essentially poly-A, and scores poorly. Hence, neither of these motifs represents the intrinsic sequence specificity of MET28. Need in vitro data for complexes.
V YHL020C OPI1 0   Dubious Motifs do not match and do not explain the ChIP-chip data from which they are derived. Motif 1049 resembles the expected UAS-INO (Ino2/4) binding site (CATGTGAAAT) - Opi1 acts as a repressor by binding Ino2. I believe this protein is a corepressor, and Ino2/4 are the DNA-binding factors. Dubious as sequence-specific TF.
V YNL103W MET4 0     My understanding is that Met4 is a modifier of the specificity of other proteins. SGD states that it "requires different combinations of the auxiliary factors Cbf1p, Met28p, Met31p and Met32p". ChIP-chip motifs 1023 and 1024 I believe are cofactor motifs; they are E-boxes. ChIP-chip motif 689 is different and matches Met28 and Met32 motifs. (CTGTGG core). Met28 is a bZIP protein, and Met32 is a C2H2. MITOMI motif for Met32 is TGTGG. So this is the Met32 motif. I do not believe that any of the Met4 motifs is correct. Need to obtain motifs for complexes.
V MATA1   0     Need to study literature more carefully and consult experts.but at first glance none of these motifs seems right
V YNL309W STB1 0   Dubious No direct evidence that this is a DNA-binding protein. It binds Swi6 and the ChIP motifs all resemble Swi4 binding sites.
V YDR049W   0   Dubious No evidence this is a TF, aside from a poorly-scoring C2H2 zinc finger
V YGR288W MAL13 0     None of the ChIP-chip motifs correspond wekk to the data they come from and/or resemble a GAL4 motif.
V YBR297W MAL33 0     None of the ChIP-chip motifs correspond wekk to the data they come from and/or resemble a GAL4 motif.
V YPL049C DIG1 0   Dubious Not a TF - it binds Ste12; all the motifs are Ste12 motifs.
V YFL052W   0   Dubious Putative zinc-cluster protein.
V MBP1-SWI6-dimer MBP1-SWI6-dimer 0     Redundant with MBP1
V YOR363C PIP2 0     See Oaf1-Pip2-dimer
V YJL206C   0     Seven motifs from ChIP-chip, but none of them corresponds well to ChIP-chip data, and none of them resembles a GAL4 motif. 1169 has a CGG in the middle, but too much flanking information to be credible without further independent support.
V YDR277C MTH1 0   Dubious SGD: "interacts with Rgt1p and the Snf3p and Rgt2p glucose sensors". There is no evidence that this is a sequence-specific transcription factor.
V YKL005C BYE1 0   Dubious SGD: "Negative regulator of transcription elongation, contains a TFIIS-like domain and a PHD finger, multicopy suppressor of temperature-sensitive ess1 mutations, probably binds RNA polymerase II large subunit". No evidence this is a sequence-specific TF.
V YNL257C SIP3 0   Dubious Sip3 is a protein that "transcription through interaction with DNA-bound Snf1p" (SGD); no DNA-binding domain and no evidence for direct interaction with DNA or intrinsic sequence specificity.
V YLR182W SWI6 0   Dubious Swi6 is a cofactor, not a DNA-binding protein. These motifs are for Mbp1 or Swi4.
V YGR040W KSS1 0   Dubious There is no evidence that Kss1 is a sequence-specific TF.
V YLR442C SIR3 0   Dubious There is no evidence that the SIR proteins are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Most of the motifs for them are Rap1 sites.
V YKR101W SIR1 0   Dubious There is no evidence that the SIR proteins are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Most of the motifs for them are Rap1 sites.
V YDR227W SIR4 0   Dubious There is no evidence that the SIR proteins are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Most of the motifs for them are Rap1 sites.
V YDL042C SIR2 0   Dubious There is no evidence that the SIR proteins are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Most of the motifs for them are Rap1 sites.
V YOR372C NDD1 0   Dubious There is no evidence that this is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein, either in vitro or in vivo or in its sequence. The ChIP-chip motif that scores most highly is actually an MCM1 motif, which is consistent with the role of NDD1 as a "transcriptional activator essential for nuclear division".
V YOR298C-A MBF1 0   Dubious This is a coactivator. I found no evidence that it is a sequence-specific TF.
V YLR113W HOG1 0   Dubious This is a signalling molecule that associates with many TFs (see SGD)
V YNR054C ESF2 0   Dubious This is supposed to be a ribosome biogenesis factor. I found no evidence that it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YNL132W KRE33 0   Dubious This is supposed to be a ribosome biogenesis factor. I found no evidence that it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YDL166C FAP7 0   Dubious This is supposed to be a ribosome biogenesis factor. I found no evidence that it is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.
V YPL216W   0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YPL016W SWI1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YOR308C SNU66 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YOR304W ISW2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YOR290C SNF2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YOR156C NFI1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YNL227C JJJ1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YNL079C TPM1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YNL039W BDP1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YNL023C FAP1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YMR213W CEF1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YMR176W ECM5 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YMR172W HOT1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YLR254C NDL1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YLR211C   0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YJL176C SWI3 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YIL122W POG1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YGR140W CBF2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YGR071C   0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YGR002C SWC4 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YGL133W ITC1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YFR037C RSC8 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YER164W CHD1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YER159C BUR6 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YER063W THO1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR485C VPS72 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR448W ADA2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR409W SIZ1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR362C TFC6 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR323C PEP7 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDR225W HTA1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YDL074C BRE1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YCR066W RAD18 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YCR033W SNT1 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YBR060C ORC2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YBL052C SAS3 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YBL003C HTA2 0   Dubious Unlikely to be true TF.
V YFL031W HAC1 1788 High   1788 is the overall winner. But, literature motif 94 also scores well in ChIP-chip, despite being somewhat different. Possible difference in heterodimerization partners, or proteolytic fragment? Retain both, score 94 as medium.
V YOL028C YAP7 1737 High   7-base bZIP core. Obtained in ChIP-chip studies and higher correspondence to stressed ChIP-chip data. Possible heterodimer? Little literature on this protein. 1737 chosen because it is largely symmetric and has highest score for both stressed and unstressed Harbison data, also, higher GO score
V YOL028C YAP7 1414 High   8-base bZIP core. Obtained by Mitomi, so this is a homodimer. Higher correspondence to unstressed ChIP-chip data. Little literature on this protein. 1414 chosen for higher ChIP-chip overall scores; plus, it is a palindrome as expected for a bZIP protein.
V YER169W RPH1 547 High   About half of the motifs look similar to each other, with GGGG core typical of many yeast C2H2 proteins. PBM motif 547 has meaningful scores on both ChIP-chip and mutant expression data. I'm somewhat concerned that motif 279 lacks two A residues captured by both PBM experiments.
V YPR065W ROX1 1396 High   About half the motifs have a typical ACAAT Sox core. MITOMI motif 1396 has highest correspondence to both ChIP-chip and deletion expression data.
V YCR039C MATALPHA2 1364 High   According to PMID: 9858582, "A comparison of the 2 binding sites in both asg and hsg operators yields the same consensus sequence, 5'-CATGTA-3"; results in Figure 2 of the same paper support a consensus of CATGTAA. MITOMI yields ACATG, which is the reverse complement of most of the literature consensus. Motif 1364 has highest information content; use this.
V YBR083W TEC1 815 High   All motifs agree, and are significant by several criteria. PBM motif 815 has the second-highest scores overall, and it is non-circular for in vivo binding. Also has highest GO score.
V YOR380W RDR1 2158 High   All motifs are related except 1851. PBM motif 2158 is monomeric and has highest correspondence to ChIP-chip data. The literature motif 756 consists of two back-to-back and slightly overlapping versions of the monomeric PBM motif. There is no evidence for direct binding in this specific spacing and orientation; however, the results of mutations in reporters indicate that both copies are necessary for induction in the mutant. Retain both motifs.
V YDR207C UME6 2239 High   All motifs are similar to each other. BEEML-PBM motif 2239 scores highest across the board.
V YBR049C REB1 907 High   All motifs are similar. ChIP-chip motif 907 has highest correspondence to both ChIP-chip and expression data, and strongly resembles MITOMI and PBM motifs.
V YHR084W STE12 400 High   All motifs but one resemble the canonical literature site. Motif 400 is derived from ChIP-chip data (on which it scores highest) but also scores highest on expression data.
V YHR178W STB5 1405 High   All motifs have CGG core and most have CGGnG. Most ChIP-derived motifs have no relationship to expression data. Mitomi motif 1405 and PBM motif 514 score decently on both ChIP-chip and expression data, and seem to nail the GO category (oxidative stress response), and look like classic Gal4 halfmers. MITOMI motif scores slighly higher overall. This is presumably the monomeric motif
V YPL202C AFT2 389 High   All motifs look similar. ChIP-chip motif 389 scores high on ChIP-chip data and also best on expression data.
V YCR106W RDS1 506 High   All motifs look similar. PBM motif 506 has a higher score on ChIP-chip than any of the ChIP-chip derived motifs.
V YDR096W GIS1 562 High   All motifs similar; PBM motif 562 has highest correspondence to deletion expression data and overexpression data
V YPL128C TBF1 2178 High   All motifs, obtained by three different means, are all very similar, although there is no ChIP or expression support for any of them. Went with 2178, which is the BEEML output.
V YLR013W GAT3 2128 High   All PBM motifs look similar, also similar to a subset of other GATAs. 2128 scores quite highly on ChIP-chip (albeit with negative correlation!), and also higher on expression and OE data.
 Download displayed records: text csv html excel word Page: 1 of 4  Records: 354